Features include Young Jeezy on the first single “ Make It Home,” as well as Yo Gotti, contributions from Eric Hudson, Drumma Boy, Cassius Jay, Jasper Cameron, and The Exclusives. Testimony is dedicated to his slain older brother Melvin LaBranch, and will be released on April 15, LaBranch’s birthday. ![]() 14 This one is for the REAL one’s ! The ones that’s stuck in the struggle.".Upon its release, Testimony was met with positive reviews from music critics, who praised Alsina's introduction to the scenario of mainstream R&B music. The album was supported by six singles: 'I Luv This Shit', 'Ghetto', 'Numb', 'Make It Home', 'Kissin' on My Tattoos' and 'No Love' along with the release of his promotional single, 'Benediction'. ![]() It was released on April 15, 2014, by Def Jam Recordings. Im telling my deepest secrets, i hope you promise to keep it. Testimony is the debut studio album by American R&B singer August Alsina. "My strongpoints and weaknesses, my highs & my downfalls, I give you my all. ![]() "My soul lies within this shit! My story, my background, my culture, my heart & lifestyle lies within this shit," said August. The cover photo is of a reverent Alsina as he kneels in front of a cross, a reflection of how grateful he is as he takes a moment to dwell on how far he’s come from the mean streets of New Orleans. August Alsina fans, rejoice! Looks like the singer's full-length debut album Testimony is really taking shape as a reality, now we have the album cover for the LP.
0 Comments
![]() Some schools and libraries already pay an annual license fee to cover these usages to find out if one is nearby, you can contact Swank at 1-80. If you want to show the movie to summer campers, you must obtain a license for $100 from Swank. However, family and friends does not extend to a large group of people. When you purchase a DVD or rent a movie, you're allowed to view the film in the privacy of your own home with your family and friends. This includes showing a movie to a wide audience. One of the many rights a copyright holder maintains is the right to publicly display their work. How is one to remake the book, but make the characters different enough from that version? Such a conundrum faces adaptors of The Wizard of Oz due to the copyrightable nature of the 1939 film. Moss cautions filmmakers when making newer film versions of literature, even if the literature is in the public domain. The impact of this ruling resonated through the entertainment community. The court's statement that the film copyrights cover 'all visual depictions' of the characters recognizes that there is often a quintessential version of a literary character that exists in the public's mind as a result of a popular film adaption. One lawyer, Aaron Moss, opined that the court's decision was recognizing conventional wisdom when it came to the audience's attachment to a film: At the very least, the scope of the film copyrights covers all visual depictions of the film characters at issue, except for any aspects of the characters that were injected into the public domain by the publicity materials. Put more simply, there is no evidence that one would be able to visualize the distinctive details of, for example, Clark Gable’s performance before watching the movie Gone with the Wind, even if one had read the book beforehand. Here, the iconic film characters seemed to possess so " consistent, wildly identifiable traits" in the court's eye. How did this happen, you might ask? Well, in July of 2011, the Eight Circuit Court of Appeals tackled the issue of The Wizard of Oz and other film characters in the landmark case Warner Bros. ![]() Any other path, and you risk getting sued. If you are going to use the 1939 version as your inspiration, you are going to need permission from MGM studios, and good luck getting that. Maybe reread the other books and watch the other films to see how they've embodied the characters differently before you flex your creative muscles and reimagine the characters. What this basically means to anyone trying to adapt the book into a movie or play is that you need to avoid inspiration from the Judy Garland version (to the best of your abilities). All of the dialogue in the film version of the movie that does not appear word-for-word in the book is still protected by copyright.Īre the characters copyrighted and what does this mean to me?Ĭharacters in the 1939 version of The Wizard of Oz are copyrighted. Recordings of the film itself, all of the recorded dialogue, and all still photos of the film, are still protected by copyright. Below I’ll describe what is and is not still protected by copyright law. It creates an interesting legal situation when a film is still protected by copyright but the story that it is based on is not. The law considers the film a “derivative work” of the original book. Instead, the copyright to The Wizard of Oz, is owned by its producer, the classic film studio MGM. The film, The Wizard of Oz, starring Judy Garland and directed in 1939 by Victor Fleming is NOT in the public domain. This follows the general rule that any work published before 1923 is in the public domain. Frank Baum in 1900 is in the public domain. The children’s book, The Wonderful Wizard of Oz, written by L. Is The Wizard of Oz in the public domain? |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |